What QA checks for
QA covers two broad categories:Structural / technical checks
These catch issues that would break the app or read as obviously wrong:- Placeholder mismatches — variables/placeholders present in the source but
missing, altered, or extra in the translation (e.g.
{count},%s,{{name}}). - Markup / tag mismatches — HTML or formatting tags that don’t line up with the source.
- Empty or whitespace-only values where text is expected.
- Leading/trailing whitespace and similar formatting slips.
Terminology checks (glossary-driven)
When a glossary applies to the project:- Forbidden terms — using a term marked forbidden (e.g. “Cart” when “Bag” is required) is flagged, with the preferred term suggested.
- Do-not-translate terms — terms that must stay in the source language are flagged if they were translated or altered.
How warnings appear
- The cell you’re editing surfaces a warning when a check fails.
- The warning explains the problem and, where possible, the fix (e.g. the correct term to use).
- QA is advisory by default — it guides translators without blocking — and pairs with the approval workflow so reviewers can act on anything that slips through.
Why it matters
- Placeholder bugs are among the most common localization defects — a dropped
{count}can crash a screen. QA catches them automatically. - Terminology consistency is enforced continuously instead of relying on every translator remembering every rule.
Working with QA
- Keep your glossary up to date — most terminology QA value comes from well-maintained do-not-translate and forbidden lists.
- Fix structural warnings before submitting; they almost always indicate a real problem.
- Use the approval workflow as a second line of defense for anything QA can’t detect (tone, meaning, nuance).
Related: Glossary · Translating · Approval Workflow

